Ambush in the Acre (Part 1): The Victim

It is the story of one remarkable place and two remarkable men. The place: Hell’s Half Acre. The men: police officer W. A. Campbell and saloon owner Bob Hammond. One man was remarkable for enforcing the law, the other for breaking the law.

On the police force only a few months at age thirty in 1909, William “Ad” Campbell pounded the toughest beat in town—the Acre. But in the contest of W. A. Campbell versus Hell’s Half Acre, Campbell felt that the Acre was the underdog.

campbell injunction 7-9-09 stEven into the early twentieth century the Acre remained a rough place, and police employed law enforcement methods there that today would bring lawsuits. This July 9, 1909 Star-Telegram clip says Acre slumlord Robert Markham sought an injunction against Campbell and another officer who, Markham said, would not allow him to collect his rents on Jones Street tenements.

campbell clean up man 8-13Campbell pounded his beat with the zeal of a reformer. Clip is from the August 13 Star-Telegram.

campbell shoots hammond 7-11Officer Campbell knew no fear. His superiors, on the other hand, did know fear: the fear that Campbell would get killed. In fact, Campbell made so many enemies with his by-the-book policing of the Acre that his superiors on more than one occasion assigned other officers to guard him as he walked his beat.

On July 10, 1909 Campbell, with two “guardian angel” officers in tow, was walking down 12th Street between Rusk (Commerce Street today) and Calhoun streets when he passed Bob Hammond, owner of the Dew Drop Inn on the eastern fringe of the Acre. On the mean streets of the Acre, Bob Hammond managed to stand out as gratuitously mean. Campbell had been warned about Hammond. As the saloon owner walked past Campbell and the other two officers, the two guardian angels were close enough to Hammond to later claim that Hammond “gritted his teeth . . . and reached for his gun.”

In response, Campbell shot at Hammond three times, hitting him twice—once in each leg. Despite such wounds, Hammond ran to the Standard Theater, where he was arrested and “disarmed.” Historians Richard Selcer and Kevin Foster, in their Written in Blood (Volume 1), write that Hammond did not have a gun on him. Note that the news story says that on the previous Thursday night, four officers had accompanied Campbell on his beat because police had heard that an attempt would be made on Campbell’s life. Clip is from the July 11 Star-Telegram.

campbell grand jury commend campbell 7-13-09On July 13 the Star-Telegram printed a commendation from the grand jury, saying the Acre needed more officers like Campbell.

campbell hammond charged 1 8-13-09 stOne month later, about 9:40 p.m. on August 12, officer Campbell, with officer Tom Jones tagging along, walked past the window of a room above the Jockey Club at 1315 Rusk Street in the Acre. A single blast from a shotgun fired from the window peppered Campbell with buckshot, killing him.

Minutes later Bob Hammond went to the police station—to learn more about the shooting, he claimed—and was arrested for the murder of Campbell. Clip is from the August 13 Star-Telegram.

campbell room searched 8-13Police quickly built a case of circumstantial evidence against Hammond. Police searched the room above the Jockey Club and found a “still warm” double-barreled shotgun. One barrel contained a spent shell. The other barrel contained a shell loaded with No. 7 buckshot—the charge that killed officer Campbell. Police also said that the shotgun used in the killing was owned by Hammond and that Hammond had left the shotgun in the Jockey Club “a couple of nights ago.”

Selcer and Foster write that Hammond claimed (1) that he had merely gotten the shotgun out of pawn for another man and (2) that he did not know what had become of the shotgun. Clip is from the August 13 Star-Telegram.

campbell hammond denies 8-14The Jockey Club proprietor said Hammond had been in the saloon about 8:30, had ordered a glass of water, and had with him a flask. The bartender identified a glass of water found in the upstairs room as the glass that Hammond had or a duplicate. Police said a flask found in the room had been bought by Hammond. The flask, the glass, and cigarette butts in the room, police said, indicated that the shooter had waited at the window a while for Campbell to pass on the sidewalk below.

The bookkeeper at Anderson’s gun shop also said Hammond had bought No. 7 buckshot shells.

Hammond denied everything and said he was a suspect only because Campbell had shot him a month earlier. Clip is from the August 14 Star-Telegram.

campbell jockey photo 8-13-09 stPhoto from the August 13 Star-Telegram re-creating the crime scene shows the second-story window and the location of Campbell and officer Jones below.

campbell meat 9-8-9 stOn September 8 the Star-Telegram quoted a man who said that on the day Hammond was released from the hospital after Campbell shot him, Hammond said, “Campbell was his meat and he would get him.”

campbell fearless as lion 8-13Police officers praised Campbell for his fearlessness in the August 13 Star-Telegram.

campbell petition 8-14As often happened after a crime in the Acre, the public reacted to the assassination of a police officer with calls to clean up the “cancerous sore.” A petition was circulated. Clip is from the August 14 Star-Telegram.

campbell sermon 8-15Sermons were preached. Clip is from the August 15 Star-Telegram.

campbell clean up acre 8-16Resolutions were adopted. Clip is from the August 16 Star-Telegram.

campbell swayne 8-14Grand juries were impaneled. On August 14 District Judge James Swayne, who had come to the legal aid of Jim Toots in 1892, said he would call a grand jury to investigate the killing of Campbell “and other things in the ‘acre.’” Swayne said that just as the murder of County Attorney Jeff McLean in 1907 had been the “death knell” of gambling in Fort Worth, so would the assassination of officer Campbell be the “death knell” of the Acre.

As for Bob Hammond, accused of assassinating police officer William “Ad” Campbell, the state seemed to have a strong case of circumstantial evidence.

Means? Check

Motive? Check

Opportunity? Check

Quick conviction? Maybe not

See Ambush in the Acre (Part 2): The Accused

Share:Email this to someoneShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on RedditShare on Tumblr
This entry was posted in Crime, Downtown, Downtown, All Around, Life in the Past Lane. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>